
On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 9:41 PM Yixun Lan dlan@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi Guo, Jisheng:
On 11:36 Sat 27 May , Guo Ren wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 8:41 PM Yixun Lan dlan@gentoo.org wrote:
Add support for Sipeed's Lichee Pi 4A board which based on T-HEAD's TH1520 SoC, only minimal device tree and serial onsole are enabled, so it's capable of chain booting from T-HEAD's vendor u-boot.
Reviewed-by: Wei Fu wefu@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan dlan@gentoo.org
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 5 ++++ board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++ board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Makefile | 5 ++++ board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/board.c | 14 ++++++++++ include/configs/th1520_lpi4a.h | 22 +++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig create mode 100644 board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/MAINTAINERS create mode 100644 board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Makefile create mode 100644 board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/board.c create mode 100644 include/configs/th1520_lpi4a.h
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index f6ed05906a..419b6171a9 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ config TARGET_SIFIVE_UNMATCHED config TARGET_STARFIVE_VISIONFIVE2 bool "Support StarFive VisionFive2 Board"
+config TARGET_TH1520_LPI4A
bool "Support Sipeed's TH1520 Lichee PI 4A Board"
select SYS_CACHE_SHIFT_6
config TARGET_SIPEED_MAIX bool "Support Sipeed Maix Board" select SYS_CACHE_SHIFT_6 @@ -66,6 +70,7 @@ source "board/emulation/qemu-riscv/Kconfig" source "board/microchip/mpfs_icicle/Kconfig" source "board/sifive/unleashed/Kconfig" source "board/sifive/unmatched/Kconfig" +source "board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig" source "board/openpiton/riscv64/Kconfig" source "board/sipeed/maix/Kconfig" source "board/starfive/visionfive2/Kconfig" diff --git a/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig b/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..622246127c --- /dev/null +++ b/board/thead/th1520_lpi4a/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +if TARGET_TH1520_LPI4A
+config ARCH_THEAD
bool
default y
+config SYS_BOARD
default "th1520_lpi4a"
for the board, I'm not sure whether people will prefer to keep the 'th1520_' prefix, otherwise we could make it shorter, leave only 'lpi4a'? thoughts?
+config SYS_VENDOR
default "thread"
~~~~~~~ notice, in my original patch, it's 'thead'
default "T-HEAD"
No, here should be 'thead', since the CONFIG_SYS_VENDOR will form board/${CONFIG_SYS_VENDOR}, please consult arch/Kconfig for reference.
I personally would prefer 't-head' which probably cause less confusion.. but since kernel use 'thead'[1], so I just follow it to keep them aligned.
But you have a typo here :)
[1] in kernel, the dts path consist of 'thead', e.g. arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/
Regards, Bin