1 Oct
2020
1 Oct
'20
4:09 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:26:36AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
tftp_cur_block start with 1 for first block, but tftp_cur_block counter is start with zero when block number is rollover. The existing code "tftp_cur_block - 1" will cause the block number become -1 in store_block() when tftp_cur_block is 0 when tftp_cur_block is rollover.
The fix pass in tftp_cur_block to store_block() and minus the tftp_block_size when do the offset calculation.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan ley.foon.tan@intel.com Reviewed-By: Ramon Fried rfried.dev@gmail.com
Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
--
Tom