
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 13:35, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:09:16PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 12:24, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:01:45PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 18:51, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 08:08:13PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com schrieb am Fr., 10. Jan. 2025, 23:46:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:06:30AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > The bootmenu command can display > > > > * menu entries defined by environment variables > > * menu entries defined by UEFI boot options > > > > Not in all cases showing the UEFI boot options is desired. > > Provide a new parameter '-e' to select the display of UEFI boot options. > > > > Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com > > Very strangely, this leads to the EFI selftest "Executing 'random number > generator'" test failing on Pi 4, where was was passing previously (and > Pi 4 has an RNG, unlike Pi 3), and this is
Do you have a link to the log?
Here's the failing part: Setting up 'random number generator' ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;32;40mSetting up 'random number generator' succeeded ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;34;40m Executing 'random number generator' ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mlib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_rng.c(52): ERROR: ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mRandom number generator protocol not available ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mlib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest.c(114): ERROR: ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mExecuting 'random number generator' failed ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;34;40m
This might help make the log more intelligible.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240811145209.4191404-37-s...
Shrug, it's the age old problem of sending raw stdout to a file. It looks fine on console as it happens, I was just grabbing from an existing log.
Oh well. I would probably suggest only writing this junk to log files if we actually need it in there (i.e. something is programmatically checking), but it seems like this is a different situation from the one my patch fixes.
I mean, yes? The problem here is that the random number generator test now fails, when it didn't before. As far as I know (and I think the rest of us understood?) your problem was that the ANSI sequences exist.
Yes, I want them to be controlled, so we can have them when needed (e.g. for user benefit, getting the terminal size) but not when not needed (CI output, log files, testing that ANSI works, etc.)
Regards, Simon