wd@denx.de wrote on Monday, July 30, 2007 5:42 PM:
In message 20070724085849.20151.20950.stgit@tq-sewsrv-4.tq-net.de you wrote:
From: Jens Gehrlein jens.gehrlein@tqs.de
This makes it necessary to prescale PITCLK by 512.
This patch is necessary for revision 102 and above of the TQM885D. Revisions 100 and 101 of the TQM885D will not work with this patch applied. But this should not be a problem, since there are only a few prototypes of this revisions floating around.
Signed-off-by: Jens Gehrlein jens.gehrlein@tqs.de Signed-off-by: Martin Krause martin.krause@tqs.de
NAK by Wolfgang Denk.
diff --git a/cpu/mpc8xx/speed.c b/cpu/mpc8xx/speed.c index 101d5f9..4173092 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc8xx/speed.c +++ b/cpu/mpc8xx/speed.c @@ -93,11 +93,23 @@ unsigned long measure_gclk(void) ulong msr_val;
#ifdef CFG_8XX_XIN +#ifdef CONFIG_TQM885D
I don't allow for board specific code in that file (and please get rid
Does this mean, I should make the code cpu specific instead (like #ifdef CONFIG_MPC885)?
Our TQM885D board uses an external 10 MHz oscillator on EXTAL (-> OSCM = 10 MHz). But measure_gclk() is assumeing that, if OSCM is used as clock source, it has a frequency of 32768 Hz (wich seems to be true for all other MPC8xx boards).
Best Regards, Martin Krause
-- TQ-Systems GmbH Muehlstrasse 2, Gut Delling, D-82229 Seefeld Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 105 018, UST-IdNr. DE 811 607 913 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Detlef Schneider, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Ruediger Stahl http://www.tq-group.com