On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:02:53 -0700 Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On 12/03/2011 09:46 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
Fix: clocks-common.c: In function 'setup_dplls': clocks-common.c:256:6: warning: variable 'sysclk_ind' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] clocks-common.c: In function 'setup_non_essential_dplls': clocks-common.c:292:6: warning: variable 'sysclk_ind' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin agust@denx.de Cc: sricharan r.sricharan@ti.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@ti.com
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c | 8 +++----- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c index 1e7e20e..1da90a4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c @@ -253,11 +253,10 @@ void configure_mpu_dpll(void)
static void setup_dplls(void) {
- u32 sysclk_ind, temp;
- u32 temp; const struct dpll_params *params;
debug("setup_dplls\n");
sysclk_ind = get_sys_clk_index();
debug("setup_dplls\n");
/* CORE dpll */ params = get_core_dpll_params(); /* default - safest */
Hand-editing the diffs? Not sure why the debug print looks like it moved. But regardless...
No, not this time. I moved the debug print intentionally to fix the coding style, while at it. It doesn't make sense to send separate patch for this coding style fix. I should have mentioned this in the commit log, sorry.
Thanks for review!
Anatolij