
10 Jul
2013
10 Jul
'13
1:33 p.m.
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 10.07.2013 13:15, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heiko,
In message51DD3D92.8050701@denx.de you wrote:
Would this be an acceptable patch for it:
...
@@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ int genphy_parse_link(struct phy_device *phydev) * both PHYs in the link */ gblpa = phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_STAT1000);
if (gblpa< 0) {
printf ("Could not read MII_STAT1000. Ignoring gigabit capability\n");
gblpa = 0;
} gblpa&= phy_read(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_CTRL1000)<< 2;
Well, this other phy_read() probably needs exactly the same error handling - and I doubt if we should actually try riding the reg when the first one failed already?
Yes, you are right. The first question is, if such a patch is the right way for fixing it, or if there is a better way ...
bye, Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany