27 May
2010
27 May
'10
5:47 p.m.
On May 27, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 7D2BA6A1-2EEF-4BF5-8B76-07AD55537BEE@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
i. e. the highest number is at the lowest address??
Correct, that is matching FSL HW docs numbering/naming.
in the .dts the alias:
- "pci0" is @ 0x8000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE3
- "pci1" is @ 0x9000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE2
- "pci2" is @ 0xa000 - FSL HW calls it PCIE1
IMHO there were several decisions that I would not exactly call intelligent - the first to assign HW names in descending order, and the second to chose a different order for the bus names.
Now we sit here and have to suffer from this :-(
Agree on both fronts.
- k