On 10/7/24 1:23 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: Kconfig: make IMX8_ROMAPI configurable
On 10/6/24 11:23 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 07:31:16AM +0800, alice.guo@oss.nxp.com
wrote:
From: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com
Make CONFIG_IMX8_ROMAPI could be configured in defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Alice Guo alice.guo@nxp.com Reviewed-by: Ye Li ye.li@nxp.com
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-
imx/Kconfig
index 134e42028c..9d3aafd2f8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ config DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION the ddrmc_cr_setting on relevant board file.
config IMX8_ROMAPI
- def_bool y
- bool "Enable i.MX ROMAPI"
- default y depends on IMX8MN || IMX8MP || IMX8ULP || IMX9
Since there's no help here, is this truly configurable, or is this something that should be select'd based on the SoC and presumably
some
of the newer IMX9 parts cannot use this?
I can imagine the MX95 calls into this custom ELE firmware stuff instead of ROMAPI ?
True. i.MX95 A55 code no need ROMAPI.
But it is still good to make this option configurable, because there is case that people no need romapi.
I have a bit of a design question instead -- does U-Boot have to make use of SCMI and ELE firmware at all ? Can this dependency be avoided?