On 18/12/14 12:14, Jagan Teki wrote:
On 17 November 2014 at 20:21, Ben Dooks ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk wrote:
From: Adnan Ali adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk
Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash indentifiers.
Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali adnan.ali@codethink.co.uk
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c index 61545ca..462e5c2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { {"S25FL016A", 0x010214, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0, 0}, {"S25FL032A", 0x010215, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0, 0}, {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, 0},
{"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, 0},What is this, already there the same part - any new?
I must have missed this when re-basing off the previous u-boot.
{"S25FL116k", 0x014015, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, 0},Is this tested! can you rebase master and send the same patches.
Yes, it was one of the devices we looked at and tested on a Marvell 88F6281 based system.
{"S25FL128P_256K", 0x012018, 0x0300, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP}, {"S25FL128P_64K", 0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, WR_QPP}, {"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, WR_QPP},-- 2.1.1
thanks!