5 Jul
2017
5 Jul
'17
12:36 a.m.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:23 AM, lukma lukma@denx.de wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:48:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:49 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
I started looking into this direction and have a question: what the point to move to that class if it's broken from the beginning?
I really do not understand who on the earth would like to have wdt_stop() at ->probe() (the only two users do exactly that!).
At least for TI (omap), please find explanation in the description of this commit:
No, it doesn't clarify for users of WDT class. It's another story AFAICS.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko