On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Lukasz Majewski lukma@denx.de wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:04:46 +0000 Alex Kiernan alex.kiernan@gmail.com wrote:
That said, squashing in that change doesn't obviously break anything for me, and is probably a step in the right direction.
I'll see what Travis thinks.
We will probably receive build breaks...
Yup... https://travis-ci.org/akiernan/u-boot/jobs/340344489
Just tried again on one of those failures (x600) with the the default removed and just set the on board that uses CONFIG_EXT, but that then fails at config time.
TBH I'd actually like to take it out of Kconfig (which I realise is the wrong direction) as it just feels fundamentally wrong the way it is. I don't know what the U-Boot approach configuration like this is... struggling to find prior art.