
2 Nov
2009
2 Nov
'09
1:50 p.m.
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
this patch conflicts with my simple SJA header posted some days ago
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/063097.html
together with a fix for two of our boards - which has not much to do with CAN. WD asked me to use a C struct to access the SJA1000.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062902.html
So where does this bring us? Either we want to use C structs for everything or decide it from patch to patch :-(
Then it should be changed, of course. This patch is far from being accepted and for the moment it's an implementation detail. I'm especially interested to hear if such a generic CAN interface would serve your purposes as well, as you require access to the SJA1000 somehow.
Wolfgang.