The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls 'part_validate_eraseblock()'.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v3: - Fix code comment (dropped 'either')
Changes in v2: - rework commit log (Eric Benard)
common/cmd_mtdparts.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c index 38a6e6d..f791372 100644 --- a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c +++ b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c @@ -381,10 +381,9 @@ static int part_validate_eraseblock(struct mtdids *id, struct part_info *part)
/** - * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are verified - * to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and either - * parts_validate_nor() or parts_validate_nand() is called with the argument - * of part. + * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are + * verified to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and + * part_validate_eraseblock() is called with the argument of part. * * @param id of the parent device * @param part partition to validate