On 2020-04-16 06:38, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Baruch,
On 16.04.20 14:22, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:
This set of patches applies on top of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/, based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a related patch series.
Joel Johnson (4): cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM
board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- cmd/Kconfig | 1 + cmd/sys_eeprom.c | 1 + configs/clearfog_defconfig | 1 - 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?
Which work are you referring to?
The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand these patches are still useful.
Joel, correct me if I am wrong.
If these are still useful, then please rebase and resubmit. I've dropped the patches in the meantime from patchwork as they didn't apply clean any more.
Thanks, Stefan
Dropping these are fine, it was indeed superseded.
Baruch, you'd included a reworked version of these into a later version of your patchset. As I recall, there were issues at the time with disabling EEPROM support which this, and the eventual merged version of your series, resolved.
Joel