-----Original Message----- From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 11:05 AM To: U-Boot user list; Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; Premi, Sanjeev; Tom Rix Cc: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: OMAP3: Pending patches
Short status update after scanning the recent mails:
Dirk Behme wrote:
To avoid loosing the overview, here my list of pending
OMAP3 patches
ready to be applied. From my point of view there are no
open comments on
these which will prevent to apply them. But please correct if I overlooked anything or add what (patches? comments?) I missed.
- OMAP3: Beagle: Set pinmux conditionally for Rev C boards
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051013.html
- OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050882.html
- OMAP3: Fix timer handling to 1ms and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html
- OMAP3: Fix changed mmc init command
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051179.html
- OMAP3: Remove unused board-types
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051338.html
We will try to switch to
print_cpuinfo & checkboard
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051365.html
Premi: Do you like to have a look? Hopefully it wouldn't be too hard.
[SP] Sure, I will...
Jean-Christophe: Please fix the "test-only" and add the documentation as requested by Wolfgang as soon as possible, that we can safely use it.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051382.html
- OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051339.html
- Zoom2 respin II (10 patches)
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050863.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050864.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050865.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050866.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050868.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050867.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050869.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050870.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050871.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050872.html
After
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051383.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051384.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051385.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051386.html
Tom has to check if an update of this series is necessary.
Note: There might be some dependencies between some of
these patches.
Different authors, sent at different time, unfortunately
this can't be
avoided. So dependent on the order the patches will be
applied, there
might be some conflicts. Let us know them, we will try to
update/fix
then as soon as possible! Most probably 5. and 7. will have some conflicts, as 5. removes some code 7. assumes it is still
there. If this
results in a conflict, let us apply the 10 patches from 7.
first and
then update 5.
Jean-Christophe: If series 7. needs an update, it would be really helpful if you could apply the other patches so that updated 7. can be rebased against them. This will reduce the risk of conflicts.
Dirk