On 08/13/2017 02:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi York,
On 7 August 2017 at 17:16, York Sun york.sun@nxp.com wrote:
SPL supports U-Boot image in FIT format which has data outside of FIT structure. This adds support for embedded data for normal FIT images.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york.sun@nxp.com
Changes in v2: Rebase on top of "SPL: FIT: factor out spl_load_fit_image()" by Andre Przywara
common/spl/spl_fit.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
There is some docs here:
doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt
I feel that what you have here should be documented in some way, associated with SPL. Any ideas?
Yes. That's my plan. I have been waiting for Andre to comment on the priority of "kervel" vs "firmware". I believe it makes sense to favor "kernel" when falcon boot is enabled. The U-Boot image shouldn't contain "kernel" node in falcon boot scenario. Or it can be changed to "standalone" as Andre did for U-Boot image (to favor "loadables").
York