
23 Aug
2012
23 Aug
'12
6:15 p.m.
Hi,
I found ubifsload does not support relative symbolic link.
A patch in 2009 said that it could resolve relative symlink. It has already been merged into "fs/ubifs/ubifs.c". But it does not work today.
Direct symlink, i.e. "to_target" or "/path/to_target", works. But relative symlink, i.e. "./to_target" or "../path/to_target", does not work.
I read ubifs.c in kernel source tree, and found folder "." and ".." are treated differently.
Can anybody give a solution?
Thanks, Dev