
18 Jun
2018
18 Jun
'18
6:59 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 03:32:43PM +0800, tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
From: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
In ARM 64-bits, memory size can be supported is more than 4GB, hence increasing save array is needed to cope with testing larger memory.
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
common/memsize.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/memsize.c b/common/memsize.c index 5670e95..b091203 100644 --- a/common/memsize.c +++ b/common/memsize.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; long get_ram_size(long *base, long maxsize) { volatile long *addr;
- long save[31];
- long save[BITS_PER_LONG]; long save_base; long cnt; long val;
Since BITS_PER_LONG is 32 or 64, shouldn't we use B_P_L - 1 here? Or are you saying there's also a case where this is wrong on 32bit today? Thanks!
--
Tom