Applied my rmobile branch.
Thanks. Nobuhiro
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Tetsuyuki Kobayshi koba@kmckk.co.jp wrote:
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi koba@kmckk.co.jp
CPU info register was read wrongly by mistake. And function rmobile_get_cpu_rev() was not called properly.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi koba@kmckk.co.jp
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info-sh73a0.c | 6 +++--- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info-sh73a0.c index f5273cf..a715efa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info-sh73a0.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info-sh73a0.c @@ -30,19 +30,19 @@ u32 rmobile_get_cpu_type(void) u32 type; struct sh73a0_hpb *hpb = (struct sh73a0_hpb *)HPB_BASE;
id = readl(hpb->cccr);
id = readl(&hpb->cccr); type = (id >> 8) & 0xFF; return type;}
-u32 get_cpu_rev(void) +u32 rmobile_get_cpu_rev(void) { u32 id; u32 rev; struct sh73a0_hpb *hpb = (struct sh73a0_hpb *)HPB_BASE;
id = readl(hpb->cccr);
id = readl(&hpb->cccr); rev = (id >> 4) & 0xF; return rev;diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info.c index 2148958..957a4fc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/rmobile/cpu_info.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void) break; default: printf("CPU: Renesas Electronics CPU rev %d\n",
get_cpu_rev());
rmobile_get_cpu_rev()); break; } return 0;-- 1.7.9.5