14 Sep
2010
14 Sep
'10
6:17 p.m.
Dear "V, Aneesh",
In message FF55437E1F14DA4BAEB721A458B6701706C58885A2@dbde02.ent.ti.com you wrote:
Presently, we are maintaining a mini bootloader(called x-loader, based on u-boot)separately. We want to integrate x-loader with u-boot and up-stream the source code.
That would be greatly appreciated.
This looks promising. However, our SPL has to load u-boot from MMC. Is it OK to keep it under nand_spl directory or should we create something like 'mmc_spl'?
Fr now we can stick with the nand_spl name (even if it's becoming a bit misleading); if other use cases get added we can discuss to rename it. Please no not create yet another such directory. I think we should concentrate such code in one location.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
A stone was placed at a ford in a river with the inscription:
"When this stone is covered it is dangerous to ford here."