20 Aug
2021
20 Aug
'21
5:02 p.m.
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 08:58, Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon,
In message CAPnjgZ0aVwo2mq9BNw-9xz+xPZVm6Negf9sQxnTAr9GHTTxPxQ@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
- programming errors
- security errors where user input is insufficiently checked
IMO the former should not be present if you have sufficient tests and trying to catch them in the field at runtime is not very kind to your users.
Wow.
I think I'll add this to my signature database:
| "Trying to catch [programming errors] in the field at runtime is not | very kind to your users." | | - Simon Glass in CAPnjgZ0aVwo2mq9BNw-9xz+xPZVm6Negf9sQxnTAr9GHTTxPxQ@mail.gmail.com
Well you've taken it out of context :-) It would make more sense if you mention the need for tests
Regards, Simon