Hi Simon,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:27:19 +0200, Simon Guinot simon.guinot@sequanux.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:25:23AM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote:
Changes for v3:
- Rebased against u-boot-mv/master and u-boot-arm/master.
Changes for v2:
- Move board support and feature into a separate patch set.
- Move mach-types update into a separate patch.
Simon Guinot (4): lacie_kw: add support for EFI partitions ARM: add netspace_mini_v2 to mach-types.h ARM: add support for Network Space v2 Lite and Mini ARM: add support for d2 Network v2
arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h | 13 +++ board/LaCie/common/common.c | 36 ++++++- board/LaCie/common/common.h | 1 + board/LaCie/netspace_v2/kwbimage-ns2l.cfg | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ board/LaCie/netspace_v2/netspace_v2.c | 4 + boards.cfg | 3 + include/configs/lacie_kw.h | 42 ++++++-- 7 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/LaCie/netspace_v2/kwbimage-ns2l.cfg
Hi Albert and Prafulla,
I thinks I miss the point with this v3 patch series. I understand now, I have to drop the patch: "ARM: add netspace_mini_v2 to mach-types.h"
The problem is that the boards netspace_mini_v2, and more recently netspace_lite_v2, have been removed from the Linux mach-types file. As a temporary solution, I could include the missing MACH_TYPE_ definitions to the header configs/lacie_kw.h.
Is that correct ?
Correct. Boards which are being dropped from Linux mach-types have not necessarily died or stopped using (older) Linux or U-Boot, so we need to keep their mach-types around, in their board config headers.
I will pull the mach-types file myself and either remove redundant mach types from config header files or Cc: maintainers of boards the machine type of which have been dropped so that they fix their boards.
If yes, do you want me to resend the whole patch series or just an update for the patch "ARM: add support for Network Space v2 Lite and Mini" ?
Only updating that patch in the series is fine with me. Prafulla ?
Regards,
Simon
Amicalement,