
Hi Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Le 25/01/2012 14:19, Daniel Gorsulowski a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Daniel GorsulowskiDaniel.Gorsulowski@esd.eu
board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c index 4882ffc..9dd4375 100644 --- a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c +++ b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c @@ -73,20 +73,20 @@ static void meesc_nand_hw_init(void) writel(csa,&matrix->csa[0]);
/* Configure SMC CS3 for NAND/SmartMedia */
- writel(AT91_SMC_SETUP_NWE(1) | AT91_SMC_SETUP_NCS_WR(0) |
AT91_SMC_SETUP_NRD(1) | AT91_SMC_SETUP_NCS_RD(0),
writel(AT91_SMC_SETUP_NWE(1) | AT91_SMC_SETUP_NCS_WR(1) |
AT91_SMC_SETUP_NRD(2) | AT91_SMC_SETUP_NCS_RD(2), &smc->cs[3].setup); writel(AT91_SMC_PULSE_NWE(3) | AT91_SMC_PULSE_NCS_WR(3) | AT91_SMC_PULSE_NRD(3) | AT91_SMC_PULSE_NCS_RD(3), &smc->cs[3].pulse);
- writel(AT91_SMC_CYCLE_NWE(5) | AT91_SMC_CYCLE_NRD(5),
- writel(AT91_SMC_CYCLE_NWE(6) | AT91_SMC_CYCLE_NRD(6), &smc->cs[3].cycle); writel(AT91_SMC_MODE_RM_NRD | AT91_SMC_MODE_WM_NWE | AT91_SMC_MODE_EXNW_DISABLE | AT91_SMC_MODE_DBW_8 |
AT91_SMC_MODE_TDF_CYCLE(3),
AT91_SMC_MODE_TDF_CYCLE(12), &smc->cs[3].mode); /* Configure RDY/BSY */
Is this (and its counterpart for otc570) a performance improvement or a bug fix?.
There were problems with a new batch of NAND flashes in our production process. We figured out, that the NAND timing is too fast. So I would call this a bug fix.
Amicalement,
Albert.
Kind regards, Daniel Gorsulowski