Hi Vladimir,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:04 AM Vladimir Oltean olteanv@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bin,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 08:05, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:50 AM Vladimir Oltean olteanv@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jianchao Wang jianchao.wang@nxp.com
The LS1021A-TSN is a development board built by VVDN/Argonboards in partnership with NXP.
It features the LS1021A SoC and the first-generation SJA1105T Ethernet switch for prototyping implementations of a subset of IEEE 802.1 TSN standards.
Supported boot media: microSD card (via SPL), QSPI flash.
Rev. A of the board uses a Spansion S25FL512S_256K serial flash, which is 64 MB in size and has an erase sector size of 256KB (therefore, flashing the RCW would erase part of U-boot).
nits: U-Boot
Why don't you add a rule to scripts/checkpatch.pl that warns on improper spelling of U-Boot? It would save a lot of time on both ends.
Yep, I once tried to add some misspelled word list of U-Boot to spelling, but checkpatch would generate lots of false-positive warnings (like u-boot.bin) so I gave it up. It seems that we need add some special handling of U-Boot spelling in checkpatch? Do you have better idea?
Rev. B and C of the board use a Spansion S25FL256S1 serial flash, which is only 32 MB in size but has an erase sector size of 64KB (therefore the RCW image can be flashed without erasing U-boot).
ditto
To avoid the problems above, the U-boot base address has been selected
ditto
[snip]
Regards, Bin