
Hi Simon,
sjg@chromium.org wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:49:40 -0600:
Add a compatible string for binman, so we can extend fixed-partitions in various ways.
I've been thinking at the proper way to describe the binman partitions. I am wondering if we should really extend the fixed-partitions schema. This description is really basic and kind of supposed to remain like that. Instead, I wonder if we should not just keep the binman compatible alone, like many others already. This way it would be very clear what is expected and allowed in both cases. I am thinking about something like that:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml
this file is also referenced there (but this patch does the same, which is what I'd expect):
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partitions.yaml
I'll let the binding maintainers judge whether they think it's relevant, it's not a strong opposition.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
[...]
+properties:
- compatible:
- const: binman
Right now this does not fit (I believe) the example. But if we no longer extend fixed-partitions but just create binman.yaml, this will probably be enough.
+additionalProperties: false
+examples:
- |
- partitions {
compatible = "binman", "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
partition@100000 {
label = "u-boot";
reg = <0x100000 0xf00000>;
};
- };
Thanks, Miquèl