On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:09:16PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 12:24, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:01:45PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 at 18:51, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 08:08:13PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com schrieb am Fr., 10. Jan. 2025, 23:46:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:06:30AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> The bootmenu command can display > > * menu entries defined by environment variables > * menu entries defined by UEFI boot options > > Not in all cases showing the UEFI boot options is desired. > Provide a new parameter '-e' to select the display of UEFI boot options. > > Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
Very strangely, this leads to the EFI selftest "Executing 'random number generator'" test failing on Pi 4, where was was passing previously (and Pi 4 has an RNG, unlike Pi 3), and this is
Do you have a link to the log?
Here's the failing part: Setting up 'random number generator' ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;32;40mSetting up 'random number generator' succeeded ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;34;40m Executing 'random number generator' ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mlib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_rng.c(52): ERROR: ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mRandom number generator protocol not available ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mlib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest.c(114): ERROR: ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;31;40mExecuting 'random number generator' failed ESC[0;37;40mESC[1;34;40m
This might help make the log more intelligible.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240811145209.4191404-37-s...
Shrug, it's the age old problem of sending raw stdout to a file. It looks fine on console as it happens, I was just grabbing from an existing log.
Oh well. I would probably suggest only writing this junk to log files if we actually need it in there (i.e. something is programmatically checking), but it seems like this is a different situation from the one my patch fixes.
I mean, yes? The problem here is that the random number generator test now fails, when it didn't before. As far as I know (and I think the rest of us understood?) your problem was that the ANSI sequences exist.