Hi Simon,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
From: Graeme Russ graeme.russ@gmail.com
[snip]
diff --git a/examples/standalone/Makefile b/examples/standalone/Makefile index baaa2fb..7c1ea5c 100644 --- a/examples/standalone/Makefile +++ b/examples/standalone/Makefile @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ $(ELF): $(obj)%: $(obj)%.o $(LIB) $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) -g -Ttext
$(CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR) \
-o $@ -e $(SYM_PREFIX)$(notdir $(<:.o=)) $<$(LIB) \
-L$(gcclibdir) -lgcc
-L$(USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC) -lgccThis forces all archs to use a private libgcc here, right? Is that the intention? It seems to break some of the powerpc boards with my
Eeep - no, that was not the intent. I did this so long ago I can't even remember why I did the USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC
eldk-5.2.1 toolchain. I'm not sure of the runes to get U-Boot to compile with a 64-bit toolchain. I think it might be best to completely get to the bottom of this rather than applying part of this patch.
So please can you point me to the x86 compiler you tested with?
All my building is done with the latest gcc the ships with Fedora 17 (can't recall the version off the top of my head)
Regards,
Graeme