Re: [U-Boot-Users] Function pointers after relocation

nyet@mrv.com wrote:

Sorry, yes, it affects FADS and ICU86x, I have 5 different boards now, all are similar to the fads, which is why it feels like "most 8xx" to me.

apologies for the hyperbole.

The changes I made to cpu/mpc8xx/start.S sorted this out for us (as supplied a couple of weeks ago to this list) - I've not been able to work out why FADS and ICU862 are treated as a special case. Simply putting the environment after the code such that its *NOT* embedded and removing the special case in the GOT table works OK - maybe its coincidence :-))