What about 'ethrotate' or 'ethshift' ?
Matthias
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 23:14, Ben Warren wrote:
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:58:21 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
In message 47850837.6020608@gmail.com you wrote:
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
This patch replaces the buildtime configuration option CONFIG_NET_DO_NOT_TRY_ANOTHER through the 'ethtoggle' runtime configuration veriable. See README.
Good idea, but surely you can come up with a better word than 'ethtoggle'... It sounds like something Elmo would show to Big Bird and doesn't have anything to do with automatically advancing devices. Of course, I don't have any useful suggestions, but will think about it.
We discussed this on IRC this afternoon. The name was agreed between Matthias Fuchs, Stefan Roese, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard, and me...
toggle to me implies a binary sense, e.g. toggling a switch on/off, whereas this code doesn't turn eth on/off, it enables/disables the round-robin polling of eth devices. 'ethpoll' isn't quite precise enough either; what about 'ethcycle' ?
Kim
Getting better...
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users