
On 11/15/21 8:35 PM, qianfanguijin@qq.com wrote:
From: qianfan Zhao qianfanguijin@163.com
CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled.
Flashing Sparse Image CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84000028, 84001028] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c]
Fix it
Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao qianfanguijin@163.com
lib/image-sparse.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c index d80fdbbf58..5ec0f94ab3 100644 --- a/lib/image-sparse.c +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c @@ -46,9 +46,66 @@ #include <asm/cache.h>
#include <linux/math64.h> +#include <linux/err.h>
static void default_log(const char *ignored, char *response) {}
+static lbaint_t write_sparse_chunk_raw(struct sparse_storage *info,
lbaint_t blk, lbaint_t blkcnt,
void *data,
char *response)
+{
- lbaint_t n = blkcnt, write_blks, blks = 0, aligned_buf_blks = 100;
- uint32_t *aligned_buf = NULL;
- if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF)) {
write_blks = info->write(info, blk, n, data);
if (write_blks < n)
goto write_fail;
return write_blks;
- }
- aligned_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, info->blksz * aligned_buf_blks);
- if (!aligned_buf) {
info->mssg("Malloc failed for: CHUNK_TYPE_RAW", response);
return -ENOMEM;
- }
- while (blkcnt > 0) {
n = min(aligned_buf_blks, blkcnt);
memcpy(aligned_buf, data, n * info->blksz);
/* write_blks might be > n due to NAND bad-blocks */
nit: <
write_blks = info->write(info, blk + blks, n, aligned_buf);
if (write_blks < n) {
free(aligned_buf);
goto write_fail;
}
blks += write_blks;
data += n * info->blksz;
blkcnt -= n;
- }
- free(aligned_buf);
- return blks;
+write_fail:
I think this label can be lower, but it does not affect correctness.
- if (IS_ERR_VALUE(write_blks)) {
printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "] (%lld)\n",
__func__, blk + blks, n, (long long)write_blks);
info->mssg("flash write failure", response);
return write_blks;
- }
- /* write_blks < n */
- printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n",
__func__, blk + blks, n);
- info->mssg("flash write failure(incomplete)", response);
- return -1;
-EIO?
+}
- int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, const char *part_name, void *data, char *response) {
@@ -152,15 +209,11 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, return -1; }
blks = info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data);
/* blks might be > blkcnt (eg. NAND bad-blocks) */
if (blks < blkcnt) {
printf("%s: %s" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n",
__func__, "Write failed, block #",
blk, blks);
info->mssg("flash write failure", response);
blks = write_sparse_chunk_raw(info, blk, blkcnt,
data, response);
if (blks < 0) return -1;
ditto
}
blk += blks; bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz; total_blocks += chunk_header->chunk_sz;
Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson sean.anderson@seco.com