3 Dec
2010
3 Dec
'10
10:48 p.m.
On Dec 3, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce beckyb@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't require any additional setup.
I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx, and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an sdram_init() function, and those that do not. We could have defined an empty sdram_init() but I hate doing that.
Would a weak function be a better way to do this?
Eeney meeney meiney mo..... If the peanut gallery prefers, I can go that way. I don't actually like either solution very much.
I'd prefer reduce the number of #defines
- k