Hi Albert,
On 26 February 2015 at 10:06, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hello Simon,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:57:05 -0700, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hello Albert,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hello Simon,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote: > Hello Simon, > > I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; > seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > applied exactly?
I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series starting here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/
The cover letter is here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429
So that is all now.
It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5.
No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4.
V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a try at u-boot-dm/spl-working.
OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied something up. I can resend if you like.
Well, if you can re-send rebase over current u-boot[-arm]/master, that would be nice. :)
But that doesn't include Masahiro's SPL config change, so it doesn't build.
Can you either resync to mainline, or I can apply via the driver model tree if you add your Ack.
I will send v5 just so that it is clean.
Regards, Simon