On Monday 18 July 2011 03:12 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Wolfgang Denkwd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
In message4E2193DC.8040207@googlemail.com you wrote:
But CONFIG_SYS_SPL_TEXT_BASE seems to be the right name for this option. Shall I fix it in the SPL framework patches?
This is getting a very long name - and if we do this, we probably have to rename a few other CONFIG_SPL_* into CONFIG_SYS_SPL_* as well.
If you are not really, really convinced this must be renamed I suggest we stick with the shorter CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE instead...
ok I won't change the SPL patches. So CONFIG_SPL_* is the new prefix for all SPL specific config options?
Ok. I will change my patch to use CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE then.
br, Aneesh