On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
On 5/6/21 9:41 PM, Leo Liang wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:09:43AM +0800, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 09:06:33AM +0800, Leo Liang wrote:
Hi Tom,
CI result: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/7400
The following changes since commit 8ddaf943589756442bba21e5be645cd47526d82b:
Merge tag 'dm-pull-29apr21' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm (2021-04-29 21:03:38 -0400)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv.git
for you to fetch changes up to 91e4b7516d84cefab7324765b3c8d6a909185ce2:
cmd/exception: support ebreak exception on RISC-V (2021-05-05 16:13:12 +0800)
Dylan Jhong (1): atcspi200: Add timeout mechanism in spi_xfer()
Green Wan (2): riscv: cpu: Add callback to init each core riscv: cpu: fu740: clear feature disable CSR
Heinrich Schuchardt (1): cmd/exception: support ebreak exception on RISC-V
arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c | 11 +++++++++++ arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/spl.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/cpu/start.S | 4 ++++ cmd/riscv/exception.c | 10 ++++++++++ doc/usage/exception.rst | 3 +++ drivers/spi/atcspi200_spi.c | 10 ++++++++-- 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Please note that currently https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=&submitter=&... shows 55 patches. Most of them have been posted long enough that I would expect them to be applied if there's no further feedback. Can you please take a look? Thanks!
No problem, sorry for the delay!
Two quick questions.
Some of the patches delegated to Andes do not own a RISC-V tag but rather clk or driver etc. Do you mind if we pull them through RISC-V tree?
Clock patches should go though Lukasz's tree, but given the scope of the patches I think it is OK for them to be in RISC-V. I would like to get an Acked-by from him, but unfortunately he hasn't commented on them at all.
In general, I believe it is OK for non-subsystem-core changes to go via the architecture / SoC tree.