On Wed 8 Jul 2009 01:58, Mike Frysinger pondered:
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case the code itself is just larger.
Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc?
I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do this. :-)
I agree it's sound a better plan but I'll take a lot's of time
Do we think there is some other project that we can acquire one from?
there was another public domain malloc implementation Robin pointed me to recently, but i cant seem to remember/find it.
It was bget