There is no good reason to use a sequence from rand() here. We may as well invent our own sequence.
This should molify Coverity which does not use rand() being used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 312949) ---
(no changes since v1)
test/dm/regmap.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/dm/regmap.c b/test/dm/regmap.c index 372a73ca0c3..04bb1645d1b 100644 --- a/test/dm/regmap.c +++ b/test/dm/regmap.c @@ -306,9 +306,8 @@ static int dm_test_devm_regmap(struct unit_test_state *uts) &dev)); priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
- srand(get_ticks() + rand()); for (i = 0; i < REGMAP_TEST_BUF_SZ; i++) { - pattern[i] = rand(); + pattern[i] = i * 0x87654321; ut_assertok(regmap_write(priv->cfg_regmap, i, pattern[i])); } for (i = 0; i < REGMAP_TEST_BUF_SZ; i++) {