13 Dec
2011
13 Dec
'11
7:18 p.m.
Dear Tom,
In message CA+M6bX=j+=UBkZ-VGoAJgFtfap+sLp4i2JypDSjJ_z-bCbw6sQ@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Which covers the omap config file changes. Assuming Wolfgang doesn't see a problem with using SYS_... in defines, Scott, do you want this via your tree (in /next) since it's NAND or in mine since it's TI boards? Assuming you don't see any problems of course. Thanks!
Indeed.
Stefano, what is this SYS_NAND_* supposed to mean? Either it is a config option, then you should name it CONFIG_SYS_NAND_* (or CONFIG_NAND_), or it is something else, in which case the "SYS_" is difficult to swallow for me (unless you have a really good explanation?)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Real computer scientists don't comment their code. The identifiers
are so long they can't afford the disk space.