On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Tom,
(seems like gmail does not honor the rule that replies should drop the "(was: xxxxx)" part in an e-mail subject; but hey, neither does Claws apparently. Sigh.)
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:17:41 -0700, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:15:02 -0700, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:27:09AM +0200, stefano babic wrote:
[snip]
One reason to move into the board directory is that there was a decision to move rules related to only one arch or SOC where they belong to, that is in the corresponding arch/ or board/ directory.
I'll admit that maybe my make-fu is off, but that idea doesn't work, at least for SPL. So I'd really like someone to make that work first.
Tom, can you be more specific than 'it doesn't work'? :)
Seriously, though, I'm interested in understand what the make issue is there, because I am indeed a proponent of putting files where they belong to, so if help is needed there, I would try to.
I have had no luck moving things like the 'MLO' rule from spl/Makefile to anywhere else. Same with the 'checkthumb' rule in the top-level Makefile.
Ok, now it is more precise :) but still not enough for me to efficiently try and analyze the issue.
Let's take the checkthumb rule. Where did you try to move it?
I tried both arch/arm/config.mk arch/arm/Makefile and couldn't make either work.