On 02/19/2017 01:59 AM, Dalon Westergreen wrote:
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 01:35 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/19/2017 12:15 AM, Dalon Westergreen wrote:
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 22:04 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 02/18/2017 09:56 PM, Dalon Westergreen wrote:
Add support for the cyclone5 soc based Terasic DE10-nano. The board is a second generation version of the DE0-nano-soc but has the a larger FPGA and hdmi support.
Signed-off-by: Dalon Westergreen dwesterg@gmail.com
Looks pretty nice, minor nits below
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- socfpga/Kconfig index e56b3db..6a776b5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig @@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ config TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE1_SOC bool "Terasic DE1-SoC (Cyclone V)" select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
+config TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE10_NANO
- bool "Terasic DE10-Nano (Cyclone V)"
- select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5
config TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT bool "Terasic SoCkit (Cyclone V)" select TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5 @@ -96,6 +100,7 @@ config SYS_BOARD default "cyclone5-socdk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5_SOCDK default "de0-nano-soc" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO default "de1-soc" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE1_SOC
- default "de10-nano" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE10_NANO default "is1" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_IS1 default "mcvevk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_DENX_MCVEVK default "sockit" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
@@ -112,6 +117,7 @@ config SYS_VENDOR default "terasic" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO default "terasic" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE1_SOC default "terasic" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
- default "terasic" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE10_NANO
Keep the list sorted please.
config SYS_SOC default "socfpga" @@ -121,6 +127,7 @@ config SYS_CONFIG_NAME default "socfpga_cyclone5_socdk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_CYCLONE5_SOCDK default "socfpga_de0_nano_soc" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE0_NANO default "socfpga_de1_soc" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE1_SOC
- default "socfpga_de10_nano" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_DE10_NANO default "socfpga_is1" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_IS1 default "socfpga_mcvevk" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_DENX_MCVEVK default "socfpga_sockit" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_TERASIC_SOCKIT
diff --git a/board/terasic/de10-nano/MAINTAINERS b/board/terasic/de10- nano/MAINTAINERS new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f4dd0df --- /dev/null +++ b/board/terasic/de10-nano/MAINTAINERS @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +DE10-NANO BOARD +M: Dalon Westergreen dwesterg@gmail.com +S: Maintained +F: include/configs/socfpga_de10_nano.h +F: configs/socfpga_de10_nano_defconfig diff --git a/board/terasic/de10-nano/Makefile b/board/terasic/de10- nano/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..86f9b78 --- /dev/null +++ b/board/terasic/de10-nano/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# +# (C) Copyright 2001-2006 +# Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de. +# (C) Copyright 2010, Thomas Chou thomas@wytron.com.tw
Really ? Looks like a new file, so (C) you
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +#
+obj-y := socfpga.o
[...]
diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_de10_nano.h b/include/configs/socfpga_de10_nano.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61a5066 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_de10_nano.h @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +/*
- Copyright (C) 2017, Intel Corporation
- SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
- */
+#ifndef __CONFIG_TERASIC_DE10_H__ +#define __CONFIG_TERASIC_DE10_H__
+#include <asm/arch/base_addr_ac5.h>
+/* U-Boot Commands */ +#define CONFIG_FAT_WRITE +#define CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
+/* Memory configurations */ +#define PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE 0x40000000 /* 1GiB */
+/* Booting Linux */ +#define CONFIG_BOOTFILE "zImage" +#define CONFIG_LOADADDR 0x01000000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR CONFIG_LOADADDR
+/* Ethernet on SoC (EMAC) */ +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_NET) +#define CONFIG_PHY_MICREL +#define CONFIG_PHY_MICREL_KSZ9031 +#endif
+#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "run fpga_cfg; run distro_bootcmd"
What is "fpga_cfg" ?
sorry, thanks for catching that. i am playing with something like the way distro boot searches for files, but for the fpga image.
Like the FPGA manager which is being upstreamed into Linux and which is the only sensible way to manage reprogramable hardware ? :) Also, if you used fitImage instead of that stupid zImage, you would be able to bundle all the components needed to boot system into a single consistent image ;-)
I know, that is my next step... :)
Cool :)