On 12 October 2012 15:39, Minkyu Kang promsoft@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Albert,
On 12 October 2012 14:53, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi all,
I am sending this notice because I have force-pushed a rollback of u-boot-arm/master.
This is due to the recently submitted u-boot-arm/master pull request being NAKed by Tom: the content of this pull req was exactly that of the latest u-boot-samsung/master pull req and was a fast forward from previous u-boot-arm/master (28e5ac2d) which had received extensive testing from Tom.
Therefore, as a roll back of u-boot-arm/master was both easy to perform and safe(r) from a release perspective, I decided to stray from formal master branch management rules and force it back to 28e5ac2d.
All: if you intend to send a pull request to u-boot-arm/master, please rework this request to take this rollback into account.
Minkyu: for the reasons above, I suggest you roll u-boot-samsung/master back to 28e5ac2d before building and sending an amended pull req, but of course the choice is yours.
OK. I'll revert soft i2c patches and send new pull request at next Monday.
sorry. spi, not i2c.
Is it OK?