"Eirik Aanonsen" eaa@wprmedical.com wrote:
I would prefer more testing over user/developer compability.
Yes. I don't feel good about merging something which no boards use by default.
But if you resize the partition for u-boot be sure to resize to 256k and not 192k, since this would cause a lot more problems than needed for us using flash chips with 128k block size. Not a big problem but an issue.
I'm talking about changing the partitioning specifically on ATSTK1000. Other boards can do whatever they want. But it may be a good idea to reserve 256k anyway since it becomes less likely that we'll have to do the same thing all over again in the future.
Also note that we're not talking about increasing the size of the boot loader in general -- if you have a custom board and don't want to spend 256k of flash on the boot loader, you'll just have to not enable these space-consuming features.
I have to say I was a bit surprised by the size of the NAND code though. The LCD code is sort of excused since it sucks in a big uncompressed logo...
I would love to see USB support implemented.
Yeah...maybe I shouldn't have said that ;-) It would be cool to be able to run console over USB, but I don't know if U-Boot has any USB gadget support...so it might take a while to implement.
Haavard