
28 Sep
2013
28 Sep
'13
3:06 p.m.
Hi Otavio,
Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:24:12 -0300, Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br a écrit :
The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls 'part_validate_eraseblock()'.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br
common/cmd_mtdparts.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c index 3023479..0104285 100644 --- a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c +++ b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c @@ -381,10 +381,10 @@ static int part_validate_eraseblock(struct mtdids *id, struct part_info *part)
/**
- Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are verified
- to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and either
- parts_validate_nor() or parts_validate_nand() is called with the argument
- of part.
- Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are
- verified to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and
- either part_validate_eraseblock() is called with the argument of
and now you can remove either ;-)
Eric