David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
The driver has been renamed dm644x_emac.c
Let me suggest "davinci_emac.c" ... the same controller is in some non-dm644x DaVinci silicon (like dm365), and a gigabit flavor is in the dm6467 chip.
OK. I named it this because the top of the file mentioned it was ripped off from 'dm644x_emac.c' (not Linux)
-COBJS = timer.o ether.o lxt972.o dp83848.o +COBJS = timer.o lxt972.o dp83848.o SOBJS = lowlevel_init.o reset.o
Given the recent cleanups in cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile, that won't quite apply. I suggest you pull some of the changes from arm-next.
OK, I'll look into that.
Procedure note: this is exactly why Linux now has a shared "-next" tree ... to make sure interdependencies between development branches can be sorted out before the next merge window, so the merge window can be spent addressing more substantive issues (if any).
Sounds good. I believe there is a 'next' branch on the U-boot mainline, and quite often we do use it, but probably should do so earlier in the process.
Thanks for the help and advice! Ben