Hi Nishanth, On Wednesday 08 January 2014 07:36 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Commit 6789e84ecaa8f45d053084e08c381284a04abff7 (i2c, omap24xx: convert driver to new mutlibus/mutliadapter framework) intended to make I2C driver compatible with latest changes. It unfortunately has had a impact on size on SPL as well. For example on SDP4430, 32032 bytes before/MLO 35416 bytes after/MLO
With this mentioned commit, MLO stops booting on SDP4430 as only 32K is accessible for non-secure (bootloader) s/w on GP devices and the size increase to 56K fails boot.
On the latest u-boot commit e7be18225fbea76d1f0034b224f0d1e60f07cfcf, MLO is now at size 35592 bytes, However, I2C is not necessary for SPL to function as we use SR_I2C for controlling the PMIC. Disabling I2C reduces MLO to 32224 bytes which allows OMAP4 GP platform to boot up.
Since this is common for all OMAP4 platforms, remove the need for I2C for SPL builds in the common config.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com
Though I originally reported this for SDP4430[1], a test on PandaBoard-ES also indicated fail to boot!
Tested on PandaBoard-ES and SDP4430 Build result: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3963101
Test log: SDP4430: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3963123 PandaBoard-ES: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3963134
[1] http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=138914031918099&w=2
include/configs/omap4_common.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/omap4_common.h b/include/configs/omap4_common.h index ea56eeb..7cfd471 100644 --- a/include/configs/omap4_common.h +++ b/include/configs/omap4_common.h @@ -154,4 +154,10 @@ #define CONFIG_SPL_DISPLAY_PRINT #define CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT "$(CPUDIR)/omap-common/u-boot-spl.lds"
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD +/* No need for i2c in SPL mode as we will use SRI2C for PMIC access on OMAP4 */ +#undef CONFIG_SYS_I2C +#undef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP24XX +#endif
#endif /* __CONFIG_OMAP4_COMMON_H */
correct. Thanks for the fix. Also with size remaining still as 32224 bytes OMAP4 HS devices might not boot up. Anyways thats separate and something more like this patch has to be removed.
Reviewed-by: Sricharan R r.sricharan@ti.com
Regards, Sricharan