Hello Scott,
Am 20.06.2013 19:52, schrieb Scott Wood:
adjust_size_for_badblocks reduces the the operation size to account
nitpicking: please only one "the".
for the block skipping done by the read/write functions when an interval (partition name or whole chip) is specified rather than a data amount.
Erase does not do block skipping, except for erase.spread which takes a data amount rather than an interval (and thus already does not call adjust_size_for_badblocks). Calling adjust_size_for_badblocks when block skipping is not done means that if bad blocks are present, the "nand erase.part" and "nand erase.chip" commands will fail to erase blocks at the end of the interval.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com Cc: Harvey Chapman hchapman@3gfp.com
common/cmd_nand.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de
bye, Heiko