17 Feb
2013
17 Feb
'13
9:11 p.m.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it is clear it is for the soc it is being build.
That was my thought... what do you think?
When I read "soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" I tend to think that this is a core USB function.
When I read "mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock" it's clear to me that this relates only to mx23/mx28.
Even if it handles the differences between mx23/mx28, I would prefer it with a "mxs" prefix.