Hi Steve,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:46:02PM -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
remove logging of the 'skipped' blocks
Signed-off-by: Steve Rae srae@broadcom.com
common/image-sparse.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/image-sparse.c b/common/image-sparse.c index f02aee4..594bf4e 100644 --- a/common/image-sparse.c +++ b/common/image-sparse.c @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void *storage_priv, sparse_buffer_t *buffer; uint32_t start; uint32_t total_blocks = 0;
uint32_t skipped = 0; int i;
debug("=== Storage ===\n");
@@ -334,7 +333,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void *storage_priv, storage, sparse_header); total_blocks += blkcnt;
skipped += blkcnt; continue;@@ -375,8 +373,8 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void *storage_priv, sparse_put_data_buffer(buffer); }
- debug("Wrote %d blocks, skipped %d, expected to write %d blocks\n",
total_blocks, skipped,
- debug("Wrote %d blocks, expected to write %d blocks\n",
total_blocks,
What's the rationale between those two patches?
Do we really want to treat the DONT_CARE chunks as if they were written?
Maxime