Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: fixed-partitions: Add alignment properties

Hi Miquel,

On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 07:11, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com wrote:

Hi Simon,

sjg@chromium.org wrote on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:06:44 -0600:

...

Add three properties for controlling alignment of partitions, aka 'entries' in fixed-partition.

For now there is no explicit mention of hierarchy, so a 'section' is just the 'fixed-partitions' node.

These new properties are inputs to the Binman packaging process, but are also needed if the firmware is repacked, to ensure that alignment constraints are not violated. Therefore they are provided as part of the schema.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org

---

Changes in v10:

• Update the minimum to 2

Changes in v9:

• Move binding example to next batch to avoid build error

Changes in v7:

• Drop patch 'Add binman compatible'
• Put the alignment properties into the fixed-partition binding

Changes in v6:

• Correct schema-validation errors missed due to older dt-schema (enum fix and reg addition)

Changes in v5:

• Add value ranges
• Consistently mention alignment must be power-of-2
• Mention that alignment refers to bytes

Changes in v2:

• Fix 'a' typo in commit message

.../bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml index 1ebe9e2347ea..656ca3db1762 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml @@ -57,6 +57,57 @@ properties: user space from type: boolean

• align:
• $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
• minimum: 2
• maximum: 0x80000000
• multipleOf: 2
• description:

•  This sets the alignment of the entry in bytes.
  

•  The entry offset is adjusted so that the entry starts on an aligned
  

•  boundary within the containing section or image. For example ‘align =
  

•  <16>’ means that the entry will start on a 16-byte boundary. This may
  

•  mean that padding is added before the entry. The padding is part of
  

•  the containing section but is not included in the entry, meaning that
  

•  an empty space may be created before the entry starts. Alignment
  

•  must be a power of 2. If ‘align’ is not provided, no alignment is
  

•  performed.
  

• align-size:
• $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
• minimum: 2
• maximum: 0x80000000
• multipleOf: 2
• description:

•  This sets the alignment of the entry size in bytes. It must be a power
  

•  of 2.
  

•  For example, to ensure that the size of an entry is a multiple of 64
  

•  bytes, set this to 64. While this does not affect the contents of the
  

•  entry within binman itself (the padding is performed only when its
  

•  parent section is assembled), the end result is that the entry ends
  

•  with the padding bytes, so may grow. If ‘align-size’ is not provided,
  

•  no alignment is performed.
  

I don't think we should mention binman here. Can we have a software agnostic description? This should be understandable from anyone playing with mtd partitions I guess.

OK

...

• align-end:
• $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
• minimum: 2
• maximum: 0x80000000
• multipleOf: 2

seems not to perfectly match the constraint, but I don't know if there is a powerOf keyword? (same above)

I believe this was discussed earlier. No there is no such option!

...

• description:

•  This sets the alignment (in bytes) of the end of an entry with respect
  

•  to the containing section. It must be a power of 2.
  

•  Some entries require that they end on an alignment boundary,
  

•  regardless of where they start. This does not move the start of the
  

•  entry, so the contents of the entry will still start at the beginning.
  

•  But there may be padding at the end. While this does not affect the
  

•  contents of the entry within binman itself (the padding is performed
  

content? same comment about binman?

OK

...

•  only when its parent section is assembled), the end result is that the
  

•  entry ends with the padding bytes, so may grow. If ‘align-end’ is not
  

•  provided, no alignment is performed.
  

if: not: required: [ reg ]

Regards, SImon