4 Jun
2009
4 Jun
'09
11:37 a.m.
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Oh well - you're right. The code failed in vmalloc() due to a too small CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN which I needed to augment to 512kB.
But then a big, fat error message is needed there!
In vmalloc(), yes. That bug could hit any code that deals with dynamically allocated memory.
Daniel