Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de wrote:

...

• return "unknown";

• return "<unidentified>";

Taste ist taste... but why <unidentified> is better that unknown ?

For me it gives a visual indication that we didn't meant to support a i.MXunknown processor ;-) i.MX<unidentified> make it easy to spot this.

But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.